West Coast port living large now, but can it last?
Port of Oakland first to stage its annual update for shippers. Other California ports to follow.
Transportation in the NewsDOT mulling HOS changes, split-sleep exemption alterations Digital Container Shipping Association is launched this month Port of Oakland joins other California ports with positive first quarter AAR reports annual declines for U.S. rail carload and intermodal units for week ending April 6 YRC Teamsters unanimously vote to endorse the tentative National Master Freight Agreement. More Transportation News
Transportation Resource2019 Top 50 Trucking Companies: Working to Stay on Top The nation’s top carriers are making every effort to extend the trucking rally, satisfy customer needs and differentiate themselves in a cutthroat market.
container volume reached an all-time high in 2018, mirroring similar box throughput numbers scored by ports in Southern California. The news comes on the eve of Oakland’s annual “State of the Port” luncheon, which apprises shippers and other transport stakeholders on the health of the state’s third largest ocean cargo gateway.
Oakland handled the equivalent of 2.55 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) last year, which was up 5.2 percent from 2017 volume. Furthermore, it was the second straight year of record volume.
According to port figures, 2018 import cargo volume increased 5 percent while exports declined 3.5 percent. The volume of empty containers returned to origin destinations for future import loads increased 19.7 percent.
Port spokesmen told LM that multiple influences were at work in 2018 shaping cargo flows, including:
- A China-U.S. trade dispute that prompted shippers to accelerate import orders ahead of anticipated tariffs
- A strong dollar that made U.S. exports costlier overseas
- A buildup of empty containers in the U.S. that required repositioning to Asia because of the import surge.
“Last year was the busiest one ever at the port for a variety of reasons,” says Port of Oakland Maritime Director . “Our objective now is to build on this performance to grow import and export volume.”
Driscoll is expected to expand upon this observation when he addresses the luncheon event tomorrow, which is co-sponsored by the .
It should be noted that the PMSA has sounded a note of skepticism on the sustainability of Oakland’s robust box numbers...as it has on the fortunes of the San Pedro Bay ports.
“California is losing market share to Eastern, Gulf and Canadian ports,” notes PMSA president .
In a recent blog post shared with LM, he noted that California’s ports have lost 5% of all North American container market share – dropping from 35.5% to 30.2% and current volume numbers are nearly 50% below state projections.
“Those that import cargo through California cite higher costs associated with regulations, and increased uncertainty with regard to constantly changing environmental regulations and associated costs as the motivations for re-routing goods,” says McLaurin.
He adds that the most disconcerting part of this diversionary trend is that once supply chains are re-routed, “they are notoriously hard to reverse.”
Next week Long Beach and Los Angeles will stage similar “state of the port” forums, and shippers will be keen to learn how they will confront these shared challenges.
About the AuthorPatrick Burnson, Executive Editor Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Next-Generation Data Capture Emerges 2019 Air Cargo Roundtable: Volumes and pricing gathering speed View More From this Issue