Happy New Year: It’s not too early for ocean cargo shippers to plan for 2020
There is “considerable unease” about the International Maritime Organization’s global emissions regulations, due to come into force on January 1, 2020.
Transportation in the NewsFebruary Truck tonnage sees slight decline compared to January, reports ATA U.S.-bound shipments fall for first time in 24 months in February, says Panjiva Port of Oakland takes a breather A Blueprint for Profitability: Understanding the Value of Continuous Delivery Network Re-routing Let’s play ball! Teamsters down to the wire in talks with YRC over new contract More Transportation News
Transportation ResourceA Blueprint for Profitability: Understanding the Value of Continuous Delivery Network Re-routing Understanding the value of continuous delivery network re-routing.
As we usher in 2019, many industry analysts are telling logistics managers to begin planning for a major transformational event coming into play for the ocean cargo sector a year from now.
According to a recent survey conducted by global shipping consultancy , there is “considerable unease” about the ’s global emissions regulations, due to come into force on January 1, 2020.
Particular concern was expressed by respondents in both the survey and follow-up interviews about carriers’ methods of fuel cost recovery with more than half of all respondents (56%) stating that they did not consider their service providers’ existing approaches as either fair or transparent.
Furthermore, four of every five shippers participating in the survey stated that they had yet to receive clarity from their providers as to how the widely anticipated future fuel cost increases, set to accompany the 2020 regulatory change, would be met.
Most alarming, perhaps, is the finding that a surprisingly large proportion (33%) of respondents to the Drewry survey admitted to having poor or very poor awareness and understanding of the new regulation.
In Drewry’s view, the level of uncertainty today as to the total cost impact is so large that nobody is able to provide a confident forecast of the cost of compliance; the only certainty is that the extra cost will run into billions of dollars globally come 2020. Based on independent “futures” prices, low-sulphur marine fuel prices per ton will be 55% higher than current high-sulphur fuels and Drewry considers that the probable “worst case” scenario is that fuel costs (paid by carriers) and fuel surcharges (paid by shippers) in global container shipping will increase by 55-60% in January 2020.
, observes that the IMO low-sulphur rule represents a very significant, industry-wide, “change event” which will likely have far reaching effects on the global shipping industry for many years to come.
“Given the scale of the extra costs triggered by the new regulation and the carriers’ expectations that their pricing and fuel charge mechanism with customers must be restructured, there is a need for carriers to address the transparency concerns expressed by their customers,” he says.
About the AuthorPatrick Burnson, Executive Editor Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
LM Viewpoint on E-commerce Logistics: Time to simplify Six Warehouse Management Trends to Watch in 2019 View More From this Issue