Ocean Carriers Top 30: Tough year on the high seas
Will the historic downfall of one major carrier provide a lesson for other Tier 1 competitors? As maritime analysts share their insights and forecasts of the ocean carrier market for 2017, they contend that this could be the year of reckoning for some.
Transportation in the NewsLooming AOBRD deadline could negatively impact trucking capacity FMCSA floating idea to allow more teenage truck drivers in interstate commerce U.S. rail and intermodal volumes see annual declines for week ending May 11 FTR Trucking Conditions Index turns negative Looking beyond the glitz and glamour of digital freight matching: questions for your DFM provider More Transportation News
Transportation ResourceDrivers and Shippers: Partnered for Success The driver shortage is causing serious concerns across the industry. But the solution is not just to add more drivers.
The poor handling of Hanjin Shipping's collapse has done irreparable damage to the Korean carrier’s reputation, and it’s improbable that the carrier can be revived, say industry analysts.
According to the Paris-based consultancy Alphaliner, even the Seoul district court’s approval for rehabilitation granted last month will not be enough to rescue. Furthermore, a merger with (HMM), or any potential “white knight,” can also be ruled out, given its financially encumbered status.
With HMM, backed by the , now looking at the acquisition of Hanjin’s “profitable” assets, a liquidation of Hanjin Shipping appears to be the most likely outcome. “It’s clear that the rapid disintegration of the company sent shock waves across the liner market,” says Alphaliner analyst Ashe Marson.
In the wake of the news, carriers and shippers are scrambling to take contingency measures to fill the void left by Hanjin Shipping, which held a global market share of just under 3%.
According to Alphaliner, the carrier’s departure is expected to be felt the most on the trans-Pacific and Asia-Europe routes, where the shipping line had capacity shares of 6.7% and 4.9%, respectively.
“Responsibility for the fallout must be jointly borne by Hanjin Shipping’s creditors and by the Hanjin Group, who continued to wrangle over sharing the cost of a financial restructuring until the very last minute, and who were unprepared to deal with the consequences of the insolvency proceedings,” adds Marson.
Arguably, shippers that use the are feeling the most significant effect from the colossal failure. The group now consists of remaining partners Cosco Container Lines, “K” Line, Yang Ming Line, and Evergreen Line.
While the CKYHE Alliance will cease to operate in 2017 as a result of consolidation in the container shipping industry, Hanjin’s abrupt collapse leaves its members scurrying for solutions during peak season. Further complicating this situation are the rumors that “K” Line may soon be acquired by an investment fund before the year is out.
Evergreen Line, meanwhile, has added new functions to its on-line e-commerce system in response to the unexpected service disruption, which caused delay to its cargoes previously loaded on the Korean carrier’s vessels. Evergreen’s new functions enable shippers to update the status of their cargoes and Hanjin’s vessel positions, including information about anchorage at or sailing to a particular port.
“Besides, Evergreen has developed detailed service plans within its own network as a substitute to cover the affected services operated by Hanjin,” says Nicola Good, an analyst with IHS Global Insight.
Meanwhile, spot container freight rates on the major routes from Asia soared by up to 42% last month following the collapse of Hanjin Shipping, according to data from the . “Unpredictable freight rates are not a new phenomenon in the container industry, however a major upheaval of supply like this is likely to cause extreme short-term price volatility,” says Richard Heath, general manager of WCI. “Shippers should expect increasing freight costs and tight allocation for several weeks at least.”
Writing on the wall
The news of Hanjin’s demise did not come as a surprise to all, however. Indeed, many industry experts had been predicting a major carrier failure for some time now.
Sanne Manders, a chief analyst with before joining the forwarding firm Flexport, says that his company had told shippers to stop booking on Hanjin months before its collapse. “The writing was on the wall, so we were able to soften the impact,” he says. “Hanjin’s monthly reports on profits showed that the carrier was unsustainable, so we counseled our shippers to find alternatives outside of the CKYHE Alliance.”
Manders adds that as a consequence, alliance members will pay closer attention to the financial health of their partners while concentrating on specific trade lane deployments for their own vessel strings. According to Andrew Lubin, an international business professor at Rosemont College, the global implications should be a major concern for logistics managers. “Hanjin Shipping’s receivership and bankruptcy filing suddenly exposed how fragile the world of shipping alliances and just-in-time supply chain management is these days,” he says.
Global shipping giant Maersk “upped the ante” by being the first to launch new generations of mega-vessels, says Lubin, thereby starting a competitive frenzy for ever larger ships. “At the same time, a severe decline in ocean freight rates resulted in three years of losses estimated in the $16 billion range,” he says. “With the majority of the carriers—except Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd—not offering financial results, one must look at the forced Cosco-CSCL merger, the Zim restructuring, or the rapidly-arranged merger to understand the severity of the losses.”
Shippers aren’t entirely blameless for this situation, either, maintains Lubin. In fact, they may bear substantial responsibility. “Despite years of claiming reliability was more important than price, Maersk was forced to abandon their ‘daily Maersk’ service as the vessel’s utilization rates were at best anemic. Shippers have pursued the cheapest rate for far tool long.”
For the time being, however, global shippers are earnestly seeking protection from regulatory watchdogs worldwide, such as the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC). According to FMC chairman , the commission is keeping a vigilant eye on all of this, and assures shippers that it will not put up with any “illegal behavior.”
“We’ve established a protocol for communicating requests for assistance to the agency concerning developments related to the status of Hanjin Shipping,” adds Cordero. “Allegations of Shipping Act violations or requests for assistance related to retrieving or receiving cargo in transit are being taken seriously by the Commission.”
Over the long term, carriers may be policing themselves as well, says the Baltic International Maritime Council (BIMCO) in Copenhagen. According to Peter Sand, BIMCO’s chief analyst, contract orders for new-build vessels at shipyards around the world have taken a dramatic dive.
“The shipyards will become the next victim of the deteriorating conditions in container markets as 2016 looks to set the record for the lowest new-building contracts in more than 20 years,” says Sand.
About the AuthorPatrick Burnson, Executive Editor Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
The Digital Supply Chain Takes Shape Top 30 U.S. Ports 2019: Trade tensions determine where cargo goes next View More From this Issue