FMC launches investigation on detention, demurrage, and per diem charges
Earlier this week, the Federal Maritime Commission said it voted to kick off an investigation that will focus on the practices of vessel operating common carriers and marine terminal operators related to detention, demurrage, and per diem charges. The investigation will be led by FMC Commissioner Rebecca Dye, whom will examine detention, demurrage, and per diem practices and evaluate five key issues.
Logistics in the NewsThree U.S. ports announce global carrier agreements in new foreign markets The hijacking of the Maersk Alabama 10 years ago: the threat is still real AscendTMS and Trucker Tools roll out integration capabilities offering AAR reports annual declines for U.S. rail carload and intermodal units for week ending April 6 Risk management alert issued by Atradius on leading Asian economies More Logistics News
Logistics ResourceStrengthening the Modern SC: Reducing Risk & Adding Resiliency with Cross-Border Trade Data Register to download a whitepaper that outlines modern supply chain risks, the global impact of disruptions, and simple ways to mitigate risk before they become a disruption.
Earlier this week, the Federal Maritime Commission said it voted to kick off an investigation that will focus on the practices of vessel operating common carriers and marine terminal operators related to detention, demurrage, and per diem charges.
The investigation will be led by FMC Commissioner Rebecca Dye, whom will examine detention, demurrage, and per diem practices and evaluate five key issues, including:
- whether the alignment of commercial, contractual and cargo interests enhances or aggravates the ability of cargo to move efficiently through U.S. ports;
- when has the carrier or MTO (maritime trade operator) tendered cargo to the shipper and consignee;
- what are the billing practices for invoicing demurrage and detention;
- what are the billing practices with respect to delays caused by various outside of intervening events; and
- what are the practices for resolution of demurrage and detention disputes between carriers and shippers
The formal launch of this investigation follows a petition filed at the FMC by the Coalition for Fair Port Practices in January, when it held a two-day hearing exploring issues raised by the petition through testimony from shippers, ocean transportation intermediaries, ocean carriers, truckers, and MTOs. This investigation will run through December 2, when a final report of Commissioner Dye’s findings and are recommendations are due to the FMC.
"The Coalition raised substantive issues in both their petition and their testimony at our January hearing investigating carrier and terminal detention and demurrage practices,” said FMC Acting Chairman Michael A. Khouri in A statement. “ Various alleged practices were described that—without countervailing or explanatory testimony and evidence—would be troubling from my perspective. However; without any filed complaints by cargo stakeholders, where the crucible of adversary proceedings can bring light and transparency to such practices, I supported this investigatory fact finding so as to more fully develop a tested factual record.”
This investigation was somewhat expected, as in September 2017 the FMC held a closed door session to receive a briefing on Petition Number P4-16, the petition of the Coalition for Fair Port Practices for rulemaking. At that session, commissioners reviewed numerous public written comments that have been submitted in response to the Petition of the Coalition for Fair Port Practices Rulemaking. Petition Number 4-16 concerns demurrage, detention and per diem business practices and charges being assessed at various ports.
Albert Saphir, president of ABS Consulting in Weston, Fla., told LM that this investigation was expected in the maritime sector, adding that it is likely to take a lot of time.
“What will come out of it and if at all any use for the trade remains to be seen,” he said. “Obviously, there are a lot of issues and concerns and underlying causes that have caused problems/expense with demurrage (and I think so less with detention) charges.
Saphir said one of the more complex and pressing issues is terminal congestion, noting that in key volume trade lanes vessels are huge now and a major unload and load operation can take 5+ days of port time. This leads to the questions of when should demurrage free time countdown start and when the first containers come off the vessel or when the vessel leaves port?
“Nobody can answer this, this is all new stuff that we have not seen before,” he said. “And how can terminals manage the influx of all these additional container volumes?”
What’s more, Saphir said that the new vessel sharing agreements add even more complexity to the mix, with Maersk and MSC containers on the same vessel and terminal, but are likely needed to be kept separate. Legacy terminal layouts and SOP’s are being challenged, he also said.
As for the demurrage issue, Saphir said it is mostly around the larger volume container carriers and the large terminals that service them.
“In South Florida, there are no reported issues with some of the smaller terminals and carriers such as Seaboard Marine or Crowley, they are doing an excellent job in turning around import and export loads, often with drivers spending less than 30-40 minutes in the terminal and of course no issues with demurrage,” he said. “But it is a delicate balance. And I think it may get even worse now, with the final enforcement of ELD. Drivers (and customers) now are held accountable for correct service hours and too many just did not prepare for it. And customers not willing to pay more for better service. So drivers now are running out of service time while waiting to pick-up containers are ports – some logistics providers have reported 7 or more days of delays at certain ports or inland terminals to get containers.”
Panjiva Research Director Chris Rogers wrote in a research note that the “3 D’s (detention, demurrage, and per diem) saw spikes in fees during the west coast port strikes in 2015 and the Hanjin Shipping crisis of 2016.
“They may become more likely given ongoing extreme weather conditions. The case may bring further disruption to the carriers’ pricing strategies after the end of the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement,” he said. “It’s uncertain whether a previous ‘box club’ investigation led by the DoJ from 2016 has made further progress.”
About the AuthorJeff Berman, Group News Editor Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. Contact Jeff Berman
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Next-Generation Data Capture Emerges 2019 Air Cargo Roundtable: Volumes and pricing gathering speed View More From this Issue