2017 State of Logistics: Truckload (TL)
Turbulent market roils with consolidations and “muted” freight demand
Transportation in the NewsSchneider expands middle mile configuration to its van truckload and intermodal assets North Carolina Ports to implement the Navis N4 terminal operating system Panjiva data shows a rebound in U.S.-bound ocean cargo shipments in March 2019 Dun & Bradstreet releases its Compliance & Procurement Sentiment Report Port of Long Beach outlines its growth strategy More Transportation News
Transportation Resource2019 Top 50 Trucking Companies: Working to Stay on Top The nation’s top carriers are making every effort to extend the trucking rally, satisfy customer needs and differentiate themselves in a cutthroat market.
Nobody can accuse the $310 billion TL market of being boring—especially at the top.
In the first six months of this year, , the storied Green Bay-based carrier, took the plunge with an initial public offering that netted in excess of $500 million. That was quickly followed by the stunning news of a $6 billion combination of Phoenix-based TL giants Knight-Swift Transportation, producing a new behemoth atop the highly fragmented TL marketplace. Even after the merger, Knight-Swift commands barely 2% market share in the low-cost, point-to-point TL sector.
These moves come at a curious time in truckload carriage. Demand has been sluggish for about a year, as too many trucks continue to chase too little freight. However, this is good news for shippers, who have been leveraging that excess capacity into lower contract rates.
, chief marketing officer at , the nation’s 7th-largest TL company, says that demand for truckload services is “somewhat muted” so far this year. But he and other TL executives remain optimistic that the second half of 2017 will bring the usual upticks in demand.
“We’d like to see it a little more robust, but we haven’t seen a drop off in volumes from the second half of last year,” says White. “Those customers demanding extra capacity are still there, but in general, it’s quiet.”
Some publicly held TL carriers are reporting sharp drops in earnings in the first quarter. , for example, saw its net profit plunge 42% in the first quarter to $4.3 million, compared to $7.5 million in the first quarter of 2016—that was despite a 9.2% jump in revenue. It’s even a worse picture at USA Truck, the nation’s No. 53 TL carrier, which suffered a $4.9 million loss in the first quarter, widening the loss of $1.8 million in the year-ago quarter.
Analysts say that part of the reason for these TL losses is the increase in online, “Uber-like” applications that link shippers and brokers to carriers seeking capacity. One of these newcomers is Next Trucking, which describes itself as an “online trucker-centric marketplace” designed to connect shippers and truckers. The company says it has $5 million in funding already secured since launching. Its goal, the company says, is to “disrupt” the truckload long-haul market.
In the meantime, veteran trucking analyst of Stifel Inc. says that the TL sector remains “sluggish,” with a few exceptions. “Dry van freight has yet to show much more than a modest seasonal uptick.”
On the positive side, Larkin says that the year-long inventory glut has largely corrected; the seasonal build of late spring/early summer merchandise is underway; a strong produce harvest in California is drawing temperature controlled equipment from the generic dry van segment; and industrial activity, led by the energy sector, has started its rebound.
“Also large fleets have shed some excess rolling stock,” says Larkin, noting that some of the large fleet downsizing may have been offset by fleet growth across many of the smaller fleets. “Normally, all of these positive factors would have resulted in a much tighter supply/demand dynamic than is reflected in the reality of today’s dry van market.”
On the demand side, many were hopeful that the tightening of the spot market and strength in the carload and flatbed sectors would translate into tightening in the dry van truckload contract market.
However, Larkin adds that “persistent mediocre” freight demand seems to be a function of uninspiring consumer demand, a wet spring, softening in the automotive sector, and recent weakness in the housing market—all of which have depressed TL demand. Most the TL market has been a series of modest ups and downs, unevenness that hampers freight demand capacity planning for carriers.
Keep in mind that this is all good news for bottom-line oriented shippers seeking TL capacity at bargain rates.
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Next-Generation Data Capture Emerges 2019 Air Cargo Roundtable: Volumes and pricing gathering speed View More From this Issue